Hillary Clinton's totally understandable response to being asked at a press conference in her capacity as Secretary of State has provoked reporting about her 'extraordinary outburst' (e.g. The Times). What's extraordinary about it other than the fact that most government figures would not expect to be asked for their spouses views on an important matter rather than their own? It would never happen to Bill, or to any other male politician. I don't think her response was anything other than a clear expression of how unacceptable the question posed actually was - if I was Hillary it would drive me mad and - unlike Hillary - I would probably lose my rag and respond with the kind of hysterical response that she is being credited with. Extraordinary is that her response is a bigger deal to the press than the idiocy of the question.
Wow - Pink Tape is 2 years old. I confess I didn't really think this far ahead when I made my first blog entry and landed on the name Pink Tape. I didn't really think ahead at all - it seemed like a good idea at the time. But it's been fun, and moderately successful, and long may the Pink Tape wind on and on.
2 years ago things were a lot different: for family law; for me. The 'Secret courts' were all the talk - now we have open justice, perhaps soon to be open reporting. The Baby P scandal had yet to break - now we have social work and CAFCASS collapse as a result of the fallout.
Some things were ever thus: proposals to slash legal aid for family practitioners were afoot, there were hotspots of CAFCASS delay and the bar had not really found its way to the blogosphere (perish the thought of embracing technology).
At home, I was just pregnant (or just about to be). And working in London. And whilst my short period of maternity leave was perfect opportunity for blogging about the job I was taking a pause from, the return to work in Bristol coupled with the ever increasing mobility and ever increasing volume levels of a 15 month old present an ever increasing challenge to making time in my life for the blog (both this one and the Family Law Week blog).
To those who poo-pooed the idea and to my nameless but very learned friend who suggested it was downright unprofessional and demeaning for a member of the bar to be involved with such trash as a blog, 3000 hits a month respectfully submit that you were wrong and that there is something of value in between Heat Magazine (to which you compared this blog) and a legal looseleaf. Clever is good. Clever and interesting is better. And successful is good. But successful and happy is better.
But enough of bitching about the past (although I do feel better for having got that off my chest), what is the future for Pink Tape? Well, I'm always happy to hear suggestions for the direction of the blog, you may like to comment on this post. But in general terms: here's to another two years at least. It may not go on for ever, but I think I have a clue who may be inheriting the Pink Tape mantle when I hang up my keyboard and blog my last...as you can see from the picture he is earnestly in training already.
I am really pleased to see that from this week health visitors will be switching over to the World Health Organisation growth charts for measurement of infant growth. I have had one stuck in my boy's red book for months, diligently plotting his growth on both the bottle fed based chart that officialdom requires and the WHO chart which I felt was more appropriate. The only time I asked my health visitor about it she had never heard of it, so I hope that some training is being rolled out. Luckily he's been storming ahead on both charts ('robust' is the word I think) but I don't think he's obese just yet.
These charts may seem trivial but they are important - because they form the cornerstone of health visitor intervention in the early months. This helpful document explains why the new charts are different and better.