Pink Tape

A BLOG FROM THE FAMILY BAR

...in which I ricochet from too serious to too flippant and where I may vent, rant or wax lyrical at my own whim, mostly about family law. Constructive co-ranting welcome. More...

Newsletter

We have survived January! Rejoice!

It really was a loooong month, wasn’t it? Death, storms, and the general dank gloom that comes with this time of year. We escaped actual flooding or storm damage here, but it’s not far from us. Quite apart from the weather though, the flow of urgent tasks has been pretty relentless, there is always a remote meeting in the day’s forecast, and my days have been filled with the usual grim reading material. And my inbox…well the floodwater there has been pretty biblical.

I’ve done a month now as FLBA Vice Chair (one reason for the rising tide of emails). It’s been an eye opener. There is so much work to do, at this toughest of times for the family bar. Lots of my friends and colleagues are desperate for the resumption of legal aid payments but extremely worried about recoupments of the contingency payments. The mood is as dank as the weather. There is talk of people leaving the bar altogether, people who have just had enough, who feel unheard and disrespected, Please keep an eye on your FLBA emails for information and news – and if you aren’t receiving your members emails let us know. It’s important you know what is happening on your behalf and what help we can offer.

On Friday, over a hundred of us (by my guess) attended a valedictory for Rebecca Stevens, a much loved solicitor who died much too young. A salutary reminder that life is short, but also that you should live your passion. She was a little ray of sunshine.

In between the rain and the gloom though, January and February do bring the occasional moment of watery sunshine. Those are the best days, where the cold air bites your face and the bright sky makes you blink. Later on Friday we trudged around the headland with the dog. It was slippery underfoot but cheering. Little green shoots poking out and up along the way are always a reminder that nothing is forever. Kids grow up, parents, pets and friends leave us, and life moves on to another phase. The world is spinning and the tectonic plates are shifting around us as we hyper focus on our cases. At moments we look up and realise we are in a different place and a different time. It’s disorientating. In 2026 I resolved not to have any new years resolutions, but I tell myself I will look up and around more, breathe more, plant my feet on the ground more firmly.

Fond as I am of metaphor and analogy, I can’t promise that the eternal winter is about to come to an end on the fees front, but I can forecast change and turbulence ahead in our work lives. This spring will bring a new President (and a bunch of other appointments to the senior courts), a new practice direction on bundles (oh frabjous day!), the beginning of a return to regular legal aid payments and a (long and bmppy) process of sorting out the issues around VAT, income tax and recoupment that flow from the disastrous hack. Although I don’t know what lies ahead on legal aid fees, I sense an incoming weather system.

What’s the difference between a barrister and a solicitor (version 2.0)

in August 2007 right at the start of Pink Tape, I wrote a post called 'What's the difference between a barrister and a solicitor?' Although that post is almost 20 years old it remains one of the all time most visited pages on this blog. Surprisingly, it remains more or less accurate (though it has a surprising number of typos and missed capitals), and it appears that it remains as needed as ever - a recent post on LinkedIn described continuing misinformation that perpetuate the idea of barristers being better or higher than solicitors. That prompted me to take another look at my old post. I thought that I'd just give the 2007 post a bit of spit and polish, to make sure it is applicable to 2026. So here goes... (if you want to read the original post you can read that here). You will notice that I didn't mention legal executives in my original post, I think because I was trying to keep things simple. But it seems important to add them in to this updated version, because they are one of...

read more

R.I.P. Sir James

The news broke this week that Sir James Munby, towering figure in family justice, died suddenly on New Year's Day. I have been thinking since about what to say here about him. He was often the subject of posts on Pink Tape, right the way back to its inception before 2010, and I have spent the morning down a rabbit hole reminding myself of all the things I have written about him - from the exasperated or irreverant posts, through to more serious posts where his judgments, speeches or 'Views' were analysed and pored over. In turn, that has led me back to the judgments and other writings, and of his work as President which my posts were marking. There are already some lovely tributes available, some gathered together in this Gazette piece, some arriving in our inboxes from the Chairs of various associations and carrying the message from the current President of the Division Sir Andrew, and some on social media - and I am sure there will be others in coming days. I only appeared in front...

read more

End of an era?

I'm away at the moment, trying to decompress after another year that can be best described as a mixed bag. Some joy, some loss, much hard work. But as the clock strikes midnight at the end of 2025 I will shed one hat and put on another. I will stop being the Chair of the Transparency Project, and become (as if by magic) the Vice Chair of the FLBA. My feelings are mixed about this too. Excitement and trepidation about the FLBA, and sadness and hope about the Transparency Project. It isn't healthy for any one organisation to have the same leader forever, so I hope that in stepping down from the TP I will also free it up to become something more than 'Lucy's pet project' (it is much more than that, because it has always been very much a team effort, but that is the perception), and something more enduring. I'll still be involved in TP, but it's time for others to take it forward. In the same way, I hope that new hands and eyes at the FLBA will also do that organisation some good -...

read more

When it’s all TMI

I had plans this week. To finish my VAT return early, tie up all my loose ends and publish a stellar post on Pink Tape to see out 2025 with. But I was waylaid. Partly by some lurgis, which I have finally vanquished, and partly due to a troublesome phone download. So instead you get this dross. Digital data...phone downloads to be precise. Every member of the family bar has been there. Fear of your search filters filtering out the nugget of important information means that it sometimes feels easier to just ask for all data from a device within a specified time period. Except. If the person who owns that phone is under the age of 40 the likelihood is that what will be produced is a haystack of mountainous proportions, liberally sprinkled with things they don't want other people to see and which, frankly, we don't much want to look at either. And things which need urgent weeding or redacting. And when that happens some poor sod (usually counsel) is going to have to sift through it....

read more

Chat GPT prompts – relied upon as evidence

I suppose it was only a matter of time. Here is a short post by Matthew Lee - a barrister who is tracking all things AI in law so you don't have to - about how chat GPT prompts were adduced in evidence in family proceedings, much in the same way as internet search history is often relied upon. Matthew's post is here, and the original judgment he is writing about is here. As Matthew points out, Chat GPT prompts are not quite the same as internet searches, and their meaning and what they might reveal about a person's motivations will be very fact specific - but it seems to me that, as with internet searches, they do have potential in some cases to be really quite important evidence. The most obvious example is queries in the aftermath of an unexplained injury by a carer, which reveal their knowledge of injury or of particular mechanisms. The circumstances in this case were much more obviously susceptible to multiple different explanations, but that doesn't mean that these searches will...

read more

About this blog

“Pink Tape” isn’t just about family law. I post about topics that interest me, which mostly revolve around family law, but also include non-legal family-related topics as well as unrelated subjects. I hope this blog will convince at least one person that not all of us in the legal profession are money-hungry sharks. Some of us are actually quite nice. Additionally, I aim to provide useful information about family law for those working in the field without being too heavy or boring.

The primary goal of the blog is to improve the quality of public information and discussions about legal issues.

I understand that not everyone is a fan of “Pink Tape” or family lawyers in general.

latest

Blog Posts

We have survived January! Rejoice!

It really was a loooong month, wasn't it? Death, storms, and the general dank gloom that comes with this time of year. We escaped actual flooding or storm damage here, but it's not far from us. Quite apart from the weather though, the flow of urgent tasks has been...

R.I.P. Sir James

The news broke this week that Sir James Munby, towering figure in family justice, died suddenly on New Year's Day. I have been thinking since about what to say here about him. He was often the subject of posts on Pink Tape, right the way back to its inception before...

End of an era?

I'm away at the moment, trying to decompress after another year that can be best described as a mixed bag. Some joy, some loss, much hard work. But as the clock strikes midnight at the end of 2025 I will shed one hat and put on another. I will stop being the Chair of...

When it’s all TMI

I had plans this week. To finish my VAT return early, tie up all my loose ends and publish a stellar post on Pink Tape to see out 2025 with. But I was waylaid. Partly by some lurgis, which I have finally vanquished, and partly due to a troublesome phone download. So...

Chat GPT prompts – relied upon as evidence

I suppose it was only a matter of time. Here is a short post by Matthew Lee - a barrister who is tracking all things AI in law so you don't have to - about how chat GPT prompts were adduced in evidence in family proceedings, much in the same way as internet search...

We’re back! Sort of…

Apparently, Pink Tape is fixed....but I have been distracted this weekend by...well... by having a weekend off. Like a normal person. Have cleaned house, cooked a roast, crocheted some crochet and contemplated buying some Christmas presents. All very normal and yet...

Rules of the blog

Anonymized or fictional

All the information on this blog is anonymized or fictional to avoid causing any trouble for anyone, including myself. I have modified details to prevent the identification of specific cases.

Comments

 I won’t approve comments that, in my judgment, breach privacy laws related to family matters. Unless individuals have been identified in a published judgment, I won’t disclose their involvement in any proceedings.

Nothing Defamatory

 I will not post anything that I believe could be considered defamatory. Due to time constraints, I can’t fact-check every statement in a comment. Therefore, I must be cautious to prevent potential legal issues or threatening letters. If you’re certain that a comment is not defamatory, you can publish it elsewhere at your own risk.

NOT Legal Advice

The content of this blog is not intended to constitute legal advice, so please don’t interpret it as such. It may seem relevant to your situation, but it likely isn’t. I cannot be held responsible for any reliance you place on its contents.

Accuracy

The information on the blog is as accurate and up to date as possible, considering my other commitments. Pink Tape is a hobby that I work on when time allows. Therefore, I can’t cover all legal changes or update information that becomes outdated.

External Links

I cannot be held responsible for the content of external sites linked from this blog, in terms of their accuracy or the opinions expressed on them

Moderation

I’ve implemented comment moderation on this blog to filter out comments that are repeatedly negative or offensive about lawyers. Rest assured, I won’t block sensible contributions, even if they disagree with me. I will strive to moderate promptly, but occasionally a comment may get lost in spam.

Right of Reply

If a post contains an inaccuracy about you and you’d like it corrected, feel free to comment for a right of reply. Please respect that the content on this blog is my intellectual property, and ask for permission before reposting. If you have any topics or blog post suggestions, feel free to email me at familoo@pinktape.co.uk.

Copyright

All material on this site is copyright of Lucy Reed. Please do not reproduce without permission.