Obligatory wellbeing post
It’s the tail end of summer, the cusp of back to school season. Every time one lawyer meets another they must ask the obligatory question: ‘Have you managed to have a break yet?’ Some say ‘Yes’, before going on to make the questioner sick with jealousy, but more often than is entirely healthy the answer is mixture of excuses, guilty regret and frustration that ‘No’, they haven’t, or ‘y’Yes’ they sort of have but their holiday has been interrupted (again) by work. Or their ‘holiday’ has been the sort that requires air quotes, and not really a break at all. At my advocates’ meeting today 3 of the 5 lawyers present were ‘on leave’, and two of us had spent considerable time this week dealing with emails about the case, notwithstanding that ‘leave’, just to ensure fairness for our clients, and that the trial fixture stand sup when it rolls around in Sept.
And so it is with me. My diary has saidI’ve been on holiday for the whole summer holidays (unusual for me to book the whole holiday off, but I thought I was going to be moving house and needed flexibility – I’m not, but that’s another moan for another day). And yet, I have ended up with no real holiday at all. Admittedly, I did agree to take on one 3 week case right in the middle of it, on the basis that it was in my local court and involved blissfully little travel (which is worth something in these days of hopeless trains and endless heatwaves), but as for the rest of the (air quotes) holiday, it has been gobbled up with dealing with issues arising in other cases, prep for cases in the autumn, cons which had to be held in order to meet an autumn deadline, and the odd urgent hearing moved into the middle of my remaining leave and which nobody else can cover (that’s tomorrow. Last week I scrubbed out the words ‘on holiday’ from my calendar in an act of final resignation to the reality that I have not and will not have a ‘proper’ summer break. My consolation prize is that I have booked out December, though I shan’t be going anywhere as the kids will be back in school, and have a peculiar and annoying sort of conscientious objection to going away over Christmas itself. It will inevitably be grey and bleak, and I imagine spending the few hours of daylight entirety of it on the sofa under a blanket eating chocolate digestives. This will of course represent a month when I am not earning any money. But I’ve booked this nonetheless because it is a necessary component of keeping going, and thus of earning any money. By December I will be desperate for a breather. I hope that I will not also be desperate for a payment from the legal aid agency (I am currently owed about 150% of my mortgage in fees by the legal aid agency, and so I am feeling the pinch – again. Perhaps as a Christmas present they will pay me some of it)…
It’s not all doom and Decembery gloom, however. I have been quietly progressing other aspects of my wellbeing alongside the relentless daily grind: my health. I haven’t been able to run since 2021: a combination of covid related weight gain (cheese and biscuits as comfort food, since you ask) and a nasty tumble down the stairs (whilst yelling for help to zip up a too-tight dress that was a casualty of said weight gain) meant that I had to stop running. The weight gain didn’t start with lockdown, and it didn’t end there either. But it continued until I no longer recognised myself in the mirror and did a double take every time I saw a photo of me. And then I’d eat another biscuit to distract myself from the stranger in the mirror, and talk about losing weight, but the pressures of work, my allergy to gyms and swimming pool changing rooms, and my increasingly creaky, painful knees meant that wasn’t realistic. Turns out carrying an extra 3 stone around is not very good for middle aged knees. And that it gives you heartburn which wakes you up at night and makes you miserable and grumpy the next day. And the only solution to that is biscuits.
So yeah, I’ve been on the jabs. And over the last 12 months I’ve lost that 3 stone. And oh my GOD do I feel better! My knees are still mildly knackered, but they work. My heartburn is gone. And the person I wake up to in the mirror every morning is me again. She has more crows feet, because the wrinkles aren’t plumped out by lard, but that’s okay. She’s me at 52, not me with an anaphylactic face.
I can touch my toes again (shockingly, I hadn’t even realised I could no longer do this until I started doing the exercises the physio gave me to strengthen my knees in the spring). And being largely local to home through the long days of summer has meant that I’ve been able to make a tentative start back at proper exercise. The cooler evenings have brought opportunities to run along the prom (for ‘run’ read run-walk-run-walk), and the early mornings have been perfect for a swim in the marine lake (a bbbrrrrracing 19 degrees at the moment, since you ask). All things which I couldn’t or wouldn’t have done without some help to lose the weight in the first place. So, to all those disapproving faces, talk to the hand – I’m firmly of the view that the jabs aren’t cheating, they are a stepping stone back to a healthier lifestyle – and at worst, even if I do put the weight back on they will have extended the life of my knees by a couple of years, and reduced the risk of the Baret’s syndrome my mum suffered with, and generally will have improved my physical resilience by increasing my ability to use my body and not just my brain. I’m not sure how long or how far my knees will permit me to run, but I’m enjoying it while it lasts. Another diagnosis means that I have realised I really do need to maximise my mobility while I can, as an investment in my body and overall health.
Meanwhile, I’ve finally been brave enough to get rid of many of the clothes that now swamp me and replace them with clothes that actually fit – and have been surprised to rediscover the joy in finding and wearing nice clothes (I now have a terrible Vinted habit).
So although I’ve not had a ‘proper’ holiday, I am feeling much better in myself, much better about myself and much more in touch with myself and my life. I count that as a wellbeing win. And I hope that this in turn will pay dividends for my productivity and vim in the courtroom.
If only there was a jab that helped a person say no to just one wafter thin hearing, as well as one which helped her say no to another wafter thin biscuit…
People will always need plates
If you are as old as me you will remember what this is quoting. If you are not, here it is. It came from a time when adverts were an art form in themselves, a little microcosm of society, of life's important moments and rites of passage and expected route - coming of age (exam results), love and marriage, domestic bliss and raising children (Hands that do dishes feel as soft as your face, aaaahhh Bisto!), aging and legacy (Fly Fishing by JR Hartley). Oh, and mortal danger from strangers at the swings (Charlie says), electricity pylons and Nic O-teen. My kids don't have to make all their phonecalls from the phone wired into the wall in the hall, or hang up at 59 minutes and redial to take advantage of BT's 10p rate for calls less than an hour. But we do have exams in our house this year. I went today to a house clearance to rescue some items belonging to a recently passed couple that couldn't be kept, hoping to give them a little bit more life and love, after their owner had passed. I...
Left hand, meet right hand (or: when you are as old as me there is nothing new in the world…)
I was 52 last week, so I suppose that since I've had twice as many times around the sun as there are supposed to be weeks in two generations worth of care proceedings, it's unsurprising if I feel like everything is changing and yet everything stays the same. But really, I do despair. Cleveland... Orkney... Re P... ABE (Achieving Best Evidence) Guidance (in various iterations)... Nobody has ever heard of them, it seems. Or at any rate 90% of the professional witnesses who set foot in the family court haven't. And the 10% who have often have a very *ahem* idiosyncratic understanding of what the ABE guidance actually says, and why it says it. Or so it sometimes appears to me, the grumpy old woman. Our bundles in the family court these days are chock full of case notes made by social workers which are written in the style of a particularly naff letter, addressed to the child in question - who is imagined in years hence to be reading through their social care records. For reasons I don't...
A post script – what about the mother’s lawyer?
In An observation of a domestic abuse fact finding hearing - a worrying vignette (over on the Transparency Project website) I wrote about what unfolded during a family court hearing I observed as a 'legal blogger'. https://transparencyproject.org.uk/an-observation-of-a-domestic-abuse-fact-finding-hearing-a-worrying-vignette/ I think that anyone who is not familiar with the family court will have been shocked by some of what I reported there. But this post script is about another aspect of the family justice system which is also illustrated by that hearing. What I write about in this post script is not out of the ordinary: it is typical. It is not a bug, but a feature. This feature is hidden from view as a result of family court privacy, poorly understood by many, and easily ignored by those with the power to change things. It matters because legal aid lawyers are the oil that keeps the creaking family justice system moving. Without them, everything grinds to a halt. And children and...
About time too…
The title of this post relates not to the shockingly long interregnum since my last, but to the news in today (via Jaime Craig, psychologist and member of the Family Justice Council) that the long heralded adjustments to the FPR relating to the instruction of appropriate psychological experts, have been approved and are about to come into force. There are a couple of important points of detail to note from the SI that brings these into being: Firstly, they come into force on 20 July, but ONLY for cases commenced after this date. So there will (should) be no messing around trying to unpick directions and instructions approved in existing cases. Pragmatically, that seems sensible in order to avoid a deluge of additional work. As a matter of principle I'm less convinced. But as any fule know: pragmatism and principle co-exist with increasing difficulty in the resource-starved family court. Secondly, the adjustments don't just relate to psychological experts but they are carefully worded...
Wading through the Grey Goo
Prince Charles (as he then was) once popularised the phrase 'grey goo' (Explained and Americanised by Wikipedia as 'gray goo'). He wasn't actually talking about AI but about nanobots. AI was merely a twinkle in a tech-bro's eye at that point, but it sometimes it feels apt to describe the waves of samey AI junk we are all wading through, like so much verbal treacle. A colleague sent me this interesting looking article on the increasing use of AI in US Courts by pro se litigants (that's litigants in person or people without lawyers to UK lawyers and normal humans respectively): Access to Justice in the Age of AI:Evidence from U.S. Federal Courts I confess, because screens, the internet and social media have rotted my brain and destroyed my concentration span*, I haven't read it in full, but it is on my 'read it properly soon' reading list, and it chimes with what I think we are all seeing on the ground in our own practices over here. The immediate response from colleagues who were cc'd...
About this blog
“Pink Tape” isn’t just about family law. I post about topics that interest me, which mostly revolve around family law, but also include non-legal family-related topics as well as unrelated subjects. I hope this blog will convince at least one person that not all of us in the legal profession are money-hungry sharks. Some of us are actually quite nice. Additionally, I aim to provide useful information about family law for those working in the field without being too heavy or boring.
The primary goal of the blog is to improve the quality of public information and discussions about legal issues.
I understand that not everyone is a fan of “Pink Tape” or family lawyers in general.
latest
Blog Posts
Obligatory wellbeing post
It's the tail end of summer, the cusp of back to school season. Every time one lawyer meets another they must ask the obligatory question: 'Have you managed to have a break yet?' Some say 'Yes', before going on to make the questioner sick with jealousy, but more often...
People will always need plates
If you are as old as me you will remember what this is quoting. If you are not, here it is. It came from a time when adverts were an art form in themselves, a little microcosm of society, of life's important moments and rites of passage and expected route - coming of...
Left hand, meet right hand (or: when you are as old as me there is nothing new in the world…)
I was 52 last week, so I suppose that since I've had twice as many times around the sun as there are supposed to be weeks in two generations worth of care proceedings, it's unsurprising if I feel like everything is changing and yet everything stays the same. But...
A post script – what about the mother’s lawyer?
In An observation of a domestic abuse fact finding hearing - a worrying vignette (over on the Transparency Project website) I wrote about what unfolded during a family court hearing I observed as a 'legal blogger'....
About time too…
The title of this post relates not to the shockingly long interregnum since my last, but to the news in today (via Jaime Craig, psychologist and member of the Family Justice Council) that the long heralded adjustments to the FPR relating to the instruction of...
Wading through the Grey Goo
Prince Charles (as he then was) once popularised the phrase 'grey goo' (Explained and Americanised by Wikipedia as 'gray goo'). He wasn't actually talking about AI but about nanobots. AI was merely a twinkle in a tech-bro's eye at that point, but it sometimes it feels...
What even IS Pink Tape?
Every time I have to explain to a youthful colleague what something now defunct was and how it used to work, I feel a little bit older... This week I thought someone was mistakenly evangelical about the new marketing idea that is corners. (corners being the little...
QLRs – what do the published judgments tell us?
Since judgments arising from the Family Court are not routinely published, what we see in them isn't necessarily representative of patterns within the Family Court as a whole. But they are one useful source of at least some information about how the QLR system is...
We have survived January! Rejoice!
It really was a loooong month, wasn't it? Death, storms, and the general dank gloom that comes with this time of year. We escaped actual flooding or storm damage here, but it's not far from us. Quite apart from the weather though, the flow of urgent tasks has been...
Rules of the blog
Anonymized or fictional
All the information on this blog is anonymized or fictional to avoid causing any trouble for anyone, including myself. I have modified details to prevent the identification of specific cases.
Comments
I won’t approve comments that, in my judgment, breach privacy laws related to family matters. Unless individuals have been identified in a published judgment, I won’t disclose their involvement in any proceedings.
Nothing Defamatory
I will not post anything that I believe could be considered defamatory. Due to time constraints, I can’t fact-check every statement in a comment. Therefore, I must be cautious to prevent potential legal issues or threatening letters. If you’re certain that a comment is not defamatory, you can publish it elsewhere at your own risk.
NOT Legal Advice
The content of this blog is not intended to constitute legal advice, so please don’t interpret it as such. It may seem relevant to your situation, but it likely isn’t. I cannot be held responsible for any reliance you place on its contents.
Accuracy
The information on the blog is as accurate and up to date as possible, considering my other commitments. Pink Tape is a hobby that I work on when time allows. Therefore, I can’t cover all legal changes or update information that becomes outdated.
External Links
I cannot be held responsible for the content of external sites linked from this blog, in terms of their accuracy or the opinions expressed on them
Moderation
I’ve implemented comment moderation on this blog to filter out comments that are repeatedly negative or offensive about lawyers. Rest assured, I won’t block sensible contributions, even if they disagree with me. I will strive to moderate promptly, but occasionally a comment may get lost in spam.
Right of Reply
If a post contains an inaccuracy about you and you’d like it corrected, feel free to comment for a right of reply. Please respect that the content on this blog is my intellectual property, and ask for permission before reposting. If you have any topics or blog post suggestions, feel free to email me at familoo@pinktape.co.uk.
Copyright
All material on this site is copyright of Lucy Reed. Please do not reproduce without permission.

